🏆 Australian Call Centre Rankings · Q3 2026

Australian Aged Care Providers Q3 2026 Call Centre Rankings

A family ringing about in-home care is usually choosing a provider within days, often after something has changed at home. The call decides whether they feel looked after, and whether they know what the service involves.

We mystery shop Australia's aged care providers as families enquiring about new in-home care services, and score every call against 48+ CX metrics aligned to the ACXPA Contact Centre CX Standards. Nobody is told when we are calling.

Overall CX

The headline score: getting through and the conversation, combined

56.4%

▲ 1.0 pts on Q2 · third gain in a row

Accessibility

How easily callers reached a real person

76.3%

▲ 0.6 pts on Q2

Agent Mastery

How well agents handled the conversation

51.6%

▼ 0.5 pts on Q2

National ranking

Aged care's Overall CX against the other sectors we benchmark

5th=

of 7 sectors · all-industry 59.0%

The quarter in one line: more families got through and the conversation felt warmer than ever, but fewer came away knowing what the service involves.

↑ Report sections
🏆 Australian Aged Care Providers Leaderboard – Q3 2026

Recognising Call Centre Excellence for Australian Aged Care Providers

Congratulations to Uniting NSW.ACT, back on top of Australian aged care providers and leading Overall CX, Accessibility and Agent Mastery.

A family weighing up in-home care is often making the decision in a hurry. The providers at the top of this table answer quickly and take the time to understand what the family needs.

Overall Winner — #1 Ranked Call Centre, Australian Aged Care Providers
🏆 BEST CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
Aged Care Providers - Q3 2026Australia’s Leading Aged Care Providers by Contact Centre CX Score on new in-home care enquiries — combining Accessibility (how easily families get through) and Agent Mastery (how well they’re helped).
1st:Uniting NSW.ACT logo 67.4%
2nd:Uniting AgeWell logo 62.7%
3rd:Blue Care logo 60.7%
Lowest:Benetas logo 36.2%
🎯 Call Centre CX Quadrant – Q3 2026

Call Centre CX Quadrant – Australian Aged Care Providers Q3 2026

The quadrant plots Accessibility (how easily a caller reaches a live agent) against Agent Mastery (how well the conversation is handled). It shows the top three and lowest three providers on Overall CX this quarter.

Uniting NSW.ACT is highest on both measures. Uniting AgeWell, Blue Care and HammondCare also sit above 50% on both.

Silverchain is easy to reach (90.2%) but below 50% on the conversation. Benetas is the only provider shown below 50% on Accessibility.

No provider reached the Best Practice zone. The highest Agent Mastery score in the sector was 56.4%, so the next gain is the conversation.

Australian Call Centre Rankings · Q3 2026

Contact Centre CX Quadrant

Australian Aged Care Providers · New in-home care service enquiries

Hover or tap a number to see who it is
BESTPRACTICEEASY TO REACHWEAK CONVERSATIONEASY TO REACHSTRONG CONVERSATIONHARD TO REACHWEAK CONVERSATIONHARD TO REACHSTRONG CONVERSATION01020304050607080901000102030405060708090100Agent Mastery (%) →Accessibility (%) →654321
Top three
1Uniting NSW.ACT67.4%Access 93.0%
Mastery 56.4%
2Uniting AgeWell62.7%Access 87.8%
Mastery 51.9%
3Blue Care60.7%Access 74.3%
Mastery 55.0%
Lowest three
4Silverchain57.6%Access 90.2%
Mastery 43.7%
5HammondCare51.9%Access 65.6%
Mastery 53.2%
6Benetas36.2%Access 45.1%
Mastery 48.5%
↑ Accessibility (up the chart)

How quickly and easily a caller gets through to a real person: phone menus, recorded messages, wait time, and whether the call is answered at all.

→ Agent Mastery (across the chart)

How well the agent handles the call once answered: understanding what the caller needs, explaining options clearly, and checking the caller is ready to proceed.

★ The goal: top right

Easy to reach and a strong conversation. Providers in the Best Practice corner score 80%+ on both.

91+ Outstanding76–90 Exceeds61–75 Meets45–60 Below<45 Poor

Shows a selection of the aged care providers ACXPA benchmarks, not every provider in the sector. Scores are the quarter average of independent mystery shopping calls, rated against the ACXPA Contact Centre CX Standards.

📋 The Quarter in Review – Q3 2026

Australian Aged Care Providers · Q3 2026

The Quarter in Review

Aged care improved for a third consecutive quarter. Overall CX averaged 56.4%, up 1.0 point on Q2.

More families got through. 92.9% of assessed calls were answered within ten minutes, up from 85.3%, and Impact rose to 86.8%, the warmest conversations the sector has recorded.

Families came away knowing less. Educate fell 7.5 points to 51.2%, the lowest of the seven sectors, and Engage fell to 21.9%, its lowest on record.

Uniting NSW.ACT is back on top at 67.4%. Silverchain posted the largest gain (+15.6 points). Benetas finished lowest at 36.2%, its lowest result on record.

📊 How aged care compares nationally · Overall CX, Q3 2026

Internet
67.2%
Energy
61.1%
Car Insurance
61.0%
Councils
60.2%
Education
56.4%
Aged Care
56.4%
Banks
52.3%

Aged care ranked equal fifth of the seven sectors with education, 2.6 points below the all-industry average of 59.0%.

It is the second-easiest sector to reach (76.3% Accessibility) and second on Impact, but last of the seven on Educate.

📊 Q3 2026 Scorecard

Every headline measure at a glance

📊 Q3 2026 Scorecard – Australian Aged Care Providers

The sector average for each measure, how it moved since Q2, and the best and weakest provider results this quarter.

See the weakest provider on every measure, free. Subscribers unlock the full scorecard.

Subscribe free
MeasureSector avgvs Q2Best in sectorWeakest in sectorYour organisation
Headline scores
Overall CX56.4%▲ 1.0 pts
67.4%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Accessibility76.3%▲ 0.6 pts
93.0%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Agent Mastery51.6%▼ 0.5 pts
56.4%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Getting through
Calls answered within 10 minutes92.9%▲ 7.6 pts
Several providers tied ▾100.0%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Average wait2:05▲ 0:14
0:16
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Time in phone menu0:49▲ 0:08
0:23
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Time to reach a person2:54▲ 0:22
0:52
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Menu layers1.5▲ 0.4
0.2
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
The conversation
Engage21.9%▼ 3.9 pts
33.3%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Discover52.7%▼ 1.7 pts
63.0%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Educate51.2%▼ 7.5 pts
59.7%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Close40.7%▼ 2.2 pts
55.6%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
Impact86.8%▲ 3.8 pts
97.2%
🔒 Free sign-up🔒
MeasureSector avgvs Q2Best in sectorWeakest in sectorYour organisation
Headline scores
Overall CX56.4%▲ 1.0 pts
67.4%
36.2%
🔒
Accessibility76.3%▲ 0.6 pts
93.0%
45.1%
🔒
Agent Mastery51.6%▼ 0.5 pts
56.4%
43.7%
🔒
Getting through
Calls answered within 10 minutes92.9%▲ 7.6 pts
Several providers tied ▾100.0%
66.7%
🔒
Average wait2:05▲ 0:14
0:16
4:36
🔒
Time in phone menu0:49▲ 0:08
0:23
1:20
🔒
Time to reach a person2:54▲ 0:22
0:52
5:55
🔒
Menu layers1.5▲ 0.4
0.2
3.0
🔒
The conversation
Engage21.9%▼ 3.9 pts
33.3%
5.6%
🔒
Discover52.7%▼ 1.7 pts
63.0%
40.7%
🔒
Educate51.2%▼ 7.5 pts
59.7%
41.7%
🔒
Close40.7%▼ 2.2 pts
55.6%
27.8%
🔒
Impact86.8%▲ 3.8 pts
97.2%
77.8%
🔒

Q3 2026 is the average of July, August and September. Hover over or tap a measure to see what it covers. Average wait and time to reach a person include unanswered calls, counted up to the time limit. Benetas answered none of our assessed calls in September, and an unanswered call scores 0% Overall CX. Green is better, red is worse.

Where would your organisation sit in this table? Aged Care Benchmarking scores your own enquiry line on every one of these measures, alongside the competitors you choose. Plans start from $397 a month.

Add your column
🏡 Provider by Provider – Q3 2026

The stories behind the numbers

🏡 Provider by Provider – What Moved in Q3

The top three, and the lowest

Uniting NSW.ACT
67.4%Overall CX · #1

Back on top, leading the sector for the fifth time in nine quarters. It topped Overall CX, Accessibility (93.0%) and Agent Mastery (56.4%).

It had the shortest wait (0:16) and the fastest time to a person (0:52) in the sector, and set the best Engage, Discover and Educate scores.

Uniting AgeWell
▼ 6.3 ptsOverall CX · now 2nd

Slipped from first to second. Accessibility fell to 87.8%, its lowest on record, though it answered every assessed call.

It set the best Close score in the sector (55.6%).

Blue Care
▲ 8.1 ptsOverall CX · 3rd

Up from fourth to third. Every assessed call was answered within ten minutes, up from 83.3% in Q2, and the average wait fell from 4:07 to 2:44.

It set the best Impact score in the sector for a second consecutive quarter, at 97.2%, its best on record.

Benetas
36.2%Overall CX · lowest

Down 14.3 points to its lowest result on record. It answered 66.7% of assessed calls and none in September.

The average wait was 4:36 and the time to reach a person 5:55, after the deepest phone menu in the sector (3.0 layers).

🔒 Want to see how other providers performed? ACXPA Members see the stories for a selection of the aged care providers we benchmark, plus provider-level results in the Aged Care Rankings Dashboard.

Become a member

🔒 Want to see how other providers performed? ACXPA Members see the stories for a selection of the aged care providers we benchmark, plus provider-level results in the Aged Care Rankings Dashboard.

Upgrade to membership

Stories for a selection of the aged care providers we benchmark this quarter.

Leading and climbing

Uniting NSW.ACT
67.4%Overall CX · #1

Back on top, leading the sector for the fifth time in nine quarters. It topped Overall CX, Accessibility (93.0%) and Agent Mastery (56.4%).

It had the shortest wait (0:16) and the fastest time to a person (0:52) in the sector, and set the best Engage, Discover and Educate scores.

Blue Care
▲ 8.1 ptsOverall CX · 3rd

Up from fourth to third. Every assessed call was answered within ten minutes, up from 83.3% in Q2, and the average wait fell from 4:07 to 2:44.

It set the best Impact score in the sector for a second consecutive quarter, at 97.2%, its best on record.

Silverchain
▲ 15.6 ptsOverall CX

The largest gain in the sector. Every assessed call was answered, up from 66.7%, and Accessibility rose 24.2 points to 90.2%, second in the sector.

The conversation has not caught up. Its Agent Mastery (43.7%), Engage (5.6%) and Educate (41.7%) scores were the lowest in the sector.

Mixed results

Uniting AgeWell
▼ 6.3 ptsOverall CX · now 2nd

Slipped from first to second. Accessibility fell to 87.8%, its lowest on record, though it answered every assessed call.

It set the best Close score in the sector (55.6%).

Bolton Clarke
58.0%Overall CX · 4th

Answered every assessed call, but its average wait rose from 0:15 to 0:51, the longest it has recorded.

Overall CX slipped 1.2 points.

HammondCare
51.9%Overall CX

A third consecutive gain, and its best Accessibility on record (65.6%).

Still, 16.7% of assessed calls weren’t answered within ten minutes, and the average wait was 4:05.

Slipping

Benetas
36.2%Overall CX · lowest

Down 14.3 points to its lowest result on record. It answered 66.7% of assessed calls and none in September.

The average wait was 4:36 and the time to reach a person 5:55, after the deepest phone menu in the sector (3.0 layers).

🚪 Where Callers Are Lost – Q3 2026

Where the sector is losing ground

🚪 Where Aged Care Providers Still Lose the Family

More families are getting through. Fewer are being told what they need to decide.

How long it takes to reach a person, split into navigating the phone menu, listening to recorded messages, and waiting for an agent:

Fastest · 0:52Uniting NSW.ACT
0:18
0:18
0:16
0:18 menu · 0:18 messages · 0:16 waiting
Sector average · 2:54Australian aged care providers
0:29
2:05
0:20 menu · 0:29 messages · 2:05 waiting
Slowest · 5:55Benetas
4:36
0:34 menu · 0:46 messages · 4:36 waiting
Navigating the menuRecorded messagesWaiting for an agent

Includes unanswered calls, counted up to the time limit. Totals can differ from the parts by a second because each figure is averaged separately.

Getting through takes longer. The average wait rose from 1:51 to 2:05, the longest of the seven sectors. Time in the phone menu (0:49) and menu depth (1.5 layers) are both the highest the sector has recorded.

7.1%of assessed calls weren’t answered within ten minutes, down from 14.7% in Q2.
2:54to reach a person on average, up from 2:32.
1.5menu layers on average, the most on record.

Families aren’t being told enough. Educate fell 7.5 points to 51.2%, the lowest of the seven sectors, and the end of the call (Close, 40.7%) is also the weakest of any sector. Engage fell to 21.9%, its lowest on record.

Explaining the service clearly is what turns a worried caller into a client. See Inbound Phone Sales Training for training on the conversation itself.

💰 Cost of Unanswered Calls

Interactive · try your own numbers

💰 What Are Unanswered Enquiry Calls Costing Your Organisation?

7.1% of assessed calls to Australian aged care providers weren’t answered within ten minutes this quarter, and the lowest answer rate was 66.7%. Put in your own numbers to see what your answer rate would cost you over a year.

Estimated value lost each year

$0

Callers not answered each month0
Who go elsewhere each year0
New clients lost each year0

Indicative only. The answer rates shown are from ACXPA mystery shopping calls in Q3 2026 (answered within ten minutes). Your own call volumes and conversion will differ.

Do you know your real answer rate for enquiry calls, as a family experiences it? Your phone system counts the calls it answered. It can't tell you what the caller went through first, or how the conversation went. Benchmarking measures both, from $397 a month.

Get Aged Care Benchmarking

Sector Trends – Australian Aged Care Providers (12-Month View)

How the sector’s three headline scores have moved over the last four quarters. Each bar is the average for Australian aged care providers in that quarter.

Australian Aged Care Providers - 12 Month Trend (Key Metrics) Q3 2026
ℹ️ How This Report Works
What the Three Scores Measure
How the Overall CX Score Is Calculated
How We Select and Score the Aged Care Providers We Benchmark
Unlock the full picture

Wondering how your own centre would score?

An ACXPA membership opens up the sector picture — full leaderboards, rolling trends and the performance ranges behind every number on this page.

But the sector isn't your centre. Benchmarking mystery-shops your line exactly the way we shopped theirs — starting at six unscripted calls a month, and going as deep as you need.

📉 Find out where your centre is losing marks — the phone menu, the wait, or the conversation itself
🏁 See your centre scored the same way — same method, same CX Standards, from $397 a month with no lock-in
🎚 Go as deep as it's worth — from a monthly snapshot of 23 core metrics up to full 48+ metric assessments with call recordings
Membership shows you the sector. Benchmarking shows you your own centre.
Deepen your view

, unlock richer sector insight — and get your centre measured

Upgrade to membership for full leaderboards, rolling trends, lifetime averages and the performance ranges this public snapshot leaves out.

And when you want your own numbers rather than the sector's, there are four benchmarking services to choose from — from a light monthly snapshot to a full private program built on your own KPIs.

🔍 Where you actually sit — lifetime, monthly and rolling leaderboards, not one quarter's snapshot
🎚 Pick your depth — 23 core metrics monthly from $397, or full 48+ metric assessments with recordings and evaluator notes
🎯 Measured against whoever matters — named competitors, or a private program against your own standards
Membership adds sector depth. Benchmarking is the only route to your centre's own metrics.
Turn context into action

, see the rankings for your own contact centre

Your membership already gives you the sector picture — dashboards, rolling trends and results across a selection of aged care providers.

What it can't tell you is how your own centre would score if we called it. Benchmarking can, at whatever depth is worth paying for — starting at six unscripted calls a month.

📉 Know exactly where you're losing marks — every stage of the call scored, from menu design to how the agent closed, not just the three headline scores
🎚 Start light or go deep — 23 core metrics monthly from $397, up to full 48+ metric assessments with call recordings and evaluator notes
🎯 Compare against whoever matters — name the competitors you want measured, or run a private program against your own KPIs and compliance checks
✅ Know what to fix first — prioritised actions to reduce friction and lift conversion, not a wall of numbers
Membership gives you the context. Benchmarking gives you the measure.
Empower your team

Seats give your team the market. Benchmarking gives you your own numbers.

Make sure your team are using their allocated Individual Member seats — that's the full sector view, already included in what you pay.

To measure your own organisation, four benchmarking services sit behind one page, from a monthly snapshot through to a private program built on your own compliance criteria.

👥 Your team sees the market — Individual Member seats you have already paid for
📉 You see your own centre — independently mystery-shopped every month, scored against the ACXPA Contact Centre CX Standards
🎚 Scale it to the question you're answering — 23 core metrics from $397, or full 48+ metric assessments with recordings
📈 A number you can take upstairs — trend analysis that stands up in a board pack
Seats show the sector. Benchmarking measures your centre.
Demonstrate your impact

Need proof for your clients? Benchmarking delivers it

Vendor seats include Individual Member access to the sector dashboards, so you can see where the market sits before you walk into the room.

To evidence provider-level performance — or prove what your own solution changed — you need independent scoring against the ACXPA Contact Centre CX Standards, delivered on a schedule rather than as a one-off.

🔎 Independent, not self-reported — third-party assessment with your name nowhere near the scoring
📈 Before and after — monthly data that shows movement over time, not a single flattering snapshot
🎚 Sized to the engagement — a light monthly measure from $397, or full 48+ metric assessments with recordings and evaluator notes
📄 Something you can actually send a client — a report they will believe because you did not write it
Membership = sector insight. Benchmarking = measurable results.

0 Comments

Leave a reply

ACXPA Platinum Sponsor

Log in with your email address

or Become an ACXPA Member

Forgot your details?

Create Account